Відео

No help

Excellent demos. I especially enjoyed seeing the magnetic flux lines superimposed. I would have loved to see the final set up with TWO sets of magnetic flux lines reflecting the inverted pole orientation.

No puns. This was extremely helpful. Most appreciated. (I've been teaching myself physics, geology, meteorology, astronomy, etc. since the pandemic.)

I wish everyone used metric and engineering notation for everything. Nice explainer.

Grt video

Francis Bacon died well before Newton was born. So he did not oppose Newton's corpuscular theory. Probably you meant Hooke

What is the brand and name of that device and is it available for retail purchase?

Thank u bro

Im surprised the alcohol doesnt remove the stickiness of the tape used to secure it

there are no black holes.. just in case....

Mmm really is not working thank u

You are very good 👍🏻

Excelent video! Thanks

thanks for the great explaining, sir! i've been struggling for almost half an hour, and you made it so easy to understand!

than you sir 😭😭😭

Idk why but my brain is making up questions about this topic and I have been looking everywhere to answer the questions in my brain but I don’t seem to find the right YT video 😕😭

very helpful thank you

All the questions about the precision and velocities are irrelevant because the experiment should have seen a phase shift differential and therefore a change in the pattern but it didn't.

Why argue very old experiments that have either been shown as correct or shown to be incorrect with modern technology - why not debate the latest and more accurate.

good explanation thanks

This was really good...

3:40 spin but not spin? (polarity?) 5:30 color but not color? (charge?) Not very intuitive names

now the elastic scattering curve at 13:00 isn't a "what if", it is measured data.

that heat sink offers no real advantage to the project.

This is too many assumptions. This is all anyone knows, so you were taught EVERY word of that. So was I. But, with a little scientific skepticism, responsible thought may arise. If reflection is a new emission complete with its own velocity, then any drift effect would be erased by both beams being reflected in the normal axis. That's just one thought. Another thought is that light emission in a massless medium would have no drift velocity and would emanate symmetrically from the source (unless accelerated). I think it's both. They didn't rule this out, because relative time is what they wanted, and they would be sad to see it go. This whole situation is goofy. The only support that I saw for this farce was pion addition experiments, but even then, they assumed nothing could go faster than light when they calibrated their detectors. There is always that constant-light declaration first, even in muons entering the atmosphere. This experiment assumed that if light is constant, decays should reach lower altitudes, but if they are going faster than light, it's the same result. It's not time dilation, it's just going faster than you BELIEVE it can. Testing it by using it is not verifying that it's true, because it's a perfect analogy to something else. Humans are this stupid on a bandwagon.

I have discovered that Faraday's law of induction is unintentional disinformation. In the case of a static magnetic field, if a circuit linked by the field expands, thereby increasing the flux linking the circuit, Faraday's law states that the changing flux produces an emf in the circuit. This is false; the changing flux linkage has no effect. There is an emf in the circuit of the same value as predicted by Faraday's law. It is motional emf due to the motion of the conductor of the circuit through the magntic field. Thus, Faraday's law is false. There are also exceptions to Faraday's law, as pointed out in The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Faraday's law is just math, not physics. It is a case of correlation, not causation. Faraday's law encompasses the Maxwell-Faraday law, which is one of Maxwell's equations. That part is true. That is why Faraday's law is like disinformation. It is partially true and partially false.

Brilliant explanation of radio, I got to use this in practice while in communications in the military.

very simplified 💯. Make more videos pls, specifically on rocket propulsion

Relativity is a scam. Light travels in its own frame of reference. Independent of the source. You accelerated the source's frame of reference but not the photon's. Two cars turning identical laps on a track. One speeds up. The slower car is experiencing time-dilation? This is beyond just being ignorant about basic physics. Light travels in its own frame of reference. Independent of the source. Let that sink in because everyone of you relativists dont have a clue how light/electromagnetic waves work in the real world.

Excellent video, thank you, I now have a better understanding of the history. An interesting consequence of a finite speed of light; as demonstrated by Olaf Romer, the observed orbital period of Io slows down while Earth moves away from Jupiter (i.e. from L to K in the diagram at approximately 3 minutes in). It is interesting because, in an expanding universe, distant galaxies are apparently moving away with a recessional velocity dependent on the distance from the observer. Therefore the further away the galaxy the slower the observed rotational velocity relative to its actual rotational velocity. At the Hubble Sphere (HS), the galaxies should appear stationary. Galaxies beyond the HS should appear to rotate in reverse time order; if the recessional velocity is a real movement. I conclude that the movement is fictitious and that the redshift-to-distance relationship is due to a cosmological dilation of relative clock time over absolute time whose rate of change is inversely proportionate to one another. This produces a scalar model where time and distance change interdependently, keeping the speed of light and other constants of nature constant as the universe evolves. I would love to discuss this with someone better qualified as it may explain the nature of dark energy, and dark matter, and why we are seeing the most distant galaxies with the JWST that appear too mature for our current theories.

We need a clock that is ineffective from every physical interference.

Does N14 also have a half-life?

left hand rule for motors and right hand rule for generators

very good explanation!

Why did you divide by cos theta?

4:04 why is that?

I have discovered that Faraday's law of induction is unintentional disinformation. In the case of a static magnetic field, if a circuit linked by the field expands, thereby increasing the flux linking the circuit, Faraday's law states that the changing flux produces an emf in the circuit. This is false; the changing flux linkage has no effect. There is an emf in the circuit of the same value as predicted by Faraday's law. It is motional emf due to the motion of the conductor of the circuit through the magntic field. Thus, Faraday's law is false. There are also exceptions to Faraday's law, as pointed out in The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Faraday's law is just math, not physics. It is a case of correlation, not causation. Faraday's law encompasses the Maxwell-Faraday law, which is one of Maxwell's equations. That part is true. That is why Faraday's law is like disinformation. It is partially true and partially false.

Thank you for your beautiful explanations. How is it that Kepler was correct in his calculations despite his belief 18:39 that the earth is the centre of the planetary system when the sun is. Ramzi

I never understood why Maxwell did not receive the Copley Medal.

thankyou this really helped me understand the difference between right hand grip for solenoids and general wires

Planck's approach was to analyze the entropy of blackbody radiation as a function of energy. To make both high-frequency and low-frequency data consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, he included an additional "guess" term proportional to the frequency (hf); this results in Planck's Law. Planck's application of Boltzmann's Statistical Mechanics to justify his guess then led to his revolutionary conclusion that the material of the walls emit and absorb radiation in discrete quanta. A paper titled "Planck’s Route to the Black Body Radiation Formula and Quantization" by Michael Fowler (7/25/08) gives a nice discussion.

Fact: over a 15-year period (of 5495 days) Mars returns facing a given star in this curious sequence of time intervals: 707 + 707 + 707 +707 + 707 +707+ 707 + 546 days. As expounded and illustrated in Chapter 5 of my new TYCHOS book (2nd Edition / Dec 2023), this means that the geoheliocentric model devised by Tycho Brahe is the only possible configuration of our Solar System. This, because the 'odd behavior' of Mars - what with its "short Empiric Sidereal Interval" of only 546 days is - perfectly accounted for in Brahe's model. It is now high time to realize this undeniable fact - and to expose Kepler's fraudulent ways in his vain quest to validate heliocentrism (as already discovered and denounced by Prof. W.H. Donahue - the American translator of Kepler's "Astronomia Nova" - back in 1988).

As an amateur musician, I refer to FM as Vibrato Broadcasting and AM as Tremolo Broadcasting

Couldn't explain in a very simple way,,,you even didn't say what Lenz law about and why we need it ?

does the direction of the field lines be perpendicular to the loop for this to work? only because they used a parallel notifier with the B(magnetic field strength).

how do we dare feign to accurately assign colors to wavelengths within the "visible spectrum" we can't directly perceive??? 10:20 is there some inference or extrapolation or Fourier transform of sorts to prove our assignment is remotely correct? is it proven by wave interference theory?

5:59 gross concept error: our eyes are limited to activation by only three different wavelength intensities, i.e. red, blue, and green. the "visible" spectrum is just a trick, and we don't actually know which color corresponds to various wavelengths. we painted a false picture on a black and white mystery, until chemical sensors, aka photographic film, was made. even then, the colored rays corresponding to pure orange, yellow, purple, etc. will only appear as grey tones on the film.

This is fortunately going to help me for my physics exam tomorrow. Thank you

Bravo bro!

ver amaizing